Component Lifecycle Data Sheet - Revision 1 - Release Date 2014-01-16 - English Technical Documentation

1. Document Overview

This technical document serves as a comprehensive record of the lifecycle and revision history for a specific electronic component. The primary purpose is to provide engineers, procurement specialists, and quality assurance teams with a clear, auditable trail of the component's development and release status. Understanding the lifecycle phase is critical for ensuring the correct version of a component is used in production, managing inventory of obsolete parts, and maintaining consistency in product design and manufacturing. The data presented here forms the foundation for effective component lifecycle management (CLM) and supply chain decision-making.

2. Lifecycle Phase and Revision Data

The core data presented in this document is highly structured and repetitive, indicating a standardized format for recording release information. Each entry represents a specific release instance of the component documentation or the component itself.

2.1 Lifecycle Phase: Revision

The lifecycle phase is consistently recorded as "Revision." This indicates that the component or its associated documentation is in a state of being updated or corrected from a previous version. It is not an initial release ("Prototype" or "New") nor a final, obsoleted state. The "Revision" phase is typical for components that are in active production but may have undergone minor changes to specifications, materials, or manufacturing processes. These changes are documented to ensure all stakeholders are aware of the current valid version.

2.2 Revision Number: 1

The revision number for all recorded entries is "1." This signifies that this document pertains to the first revision of the component or its datasheet. In a typical versioning system, this follows an initial release (often revision 0 or A). The consistency of this number across all entries suggests this document captures a snapshot of the component at Revision 1. It is crucial for users to verify they are working with the correct revision to avoid discrepancies between design, testing, and production that could arise from using different versions.

2.3 Expired Period: Forever

The "Expired Period" is listed as "Forever." This is a significant data point in lifecycle management. It indicates that this particular revision (Revision 1) does not have a pre-defined expiration or end-of-life (EOL) date set at the time of this document's release. The component is intended for ongoing, long-term availability. This contrasts with components that have a limited production life or are scheduled for obsolescence. The "Forever" designation provides supply chain stability, but it is always subject to change based on market demand, material availability, or technological advancements. Regular checks for lifecycle notifications are still recommended.

2.4 Release Date: 2014-01-16 16:06:38.0

The release date and timestamp are precisely recorded as 2014-01-16 16:06:38.0. This level of granularity (down to tenths of a second) is essential for version control systems and audit trails. It allows for unambiguous identification of when this specific revision was officially released and made effective. The date indicates this document and the component revision it describes have been in circulation since early 2014. When comparing documents or component lots, this timestamp is a key differentiator.

3. Data Structure and Format Analysis

The PDF content shows a repeated pattern of the same four data fields. This structure is typical for:

• Log or List Format: It may represent a log of multiple releases, though the data is identical, suggesting it could be a template or a list where only one entry is populated in this instance.
• Data Field Emphasis: The repetition visually reinforces the four critical pieces of information: Phase, Revision, Expiry, and Release Date.
• Standardized Template: The use of specific symbols (, ‧) likely denotes bullet points or section markers in the original document format, which may have been lost or misinterpreted in the text extraction process.

The consistent formatting underscores the importance of each field in the component's technical and administrative documentation.

4. Application and Usage Guidelines

4.1 Integration in Design and Manufacturing

This document should be referenced at several key stages:

• Design Phase: Engineers must specify "Revision 1" on all schematics, bills of materials (BOMs), and layout files to ensure manufacturing uses the correct component version.
• Procurement: Purchasing departments must use the full part number including the revision suffix (e.g., -REV1) when ordering components to prevent receiving obsolete or newer, untested revisions.
• Incoming Inspection: Quality teams should verify the revision marking on component reels or trays against this document to confirm conformity.

4.2 Version Control and Change Management

The data facilitates a robust change management process. If a future revision (e.g., Revision 2) is released, this document (Rev 1) becomes the baseline for understanding what changed. Differences in electrical parameters, packaging, or recommended land patterns would be detailed in an Engineering Change Notice (ECN) that references the shift from the 2014-01-16 Release Date of Rev 1 to the new release.

5. Technical Implications of Lifecycle Data

5.1 Long-Term Support and Sourcing

The "Forever" expired period implies a commitment to long-term manufacturing support. However, designers should understand that "Forever" in the electronics industry often means "for the foreseeable product life." It is prudent to periodically check the manufacturer's product lifecycle status page for any updates or discontinuation notices, even for components with this designation. Developing a multi-sourcing strategy or identifying potential alternates early in the design process is a recommended risk mitigation practice.

5.2 Traceability and Quality Assurance

The precise release date and revision number are vital for traceability, especially in industries with stringent quality standards (automotive, medical, aerospace). In the event of a field failure, being able to trace a component back to its specific revision and release timeframe can help isolate issues to particular manufacturing lots or design iterations, enabling targeted recalls or corrective actions.

6. Storage and Handling Considerations

While this document does not specify physical storage conditions for the component itself, the information it contains dictates administrative handling:

• Document Archiving: This PDF should be stored in a controlled document management system with clear version history. The 2014 release date should be part of its metadata.
• Obsolete Document Control: If a newer revision supersedes this one, this document should be officially marked as "Superseded" or "Historical" in the archive to prevent its accidental use in new designs.
• Accessibility: The document should be readily accessible to all members of the design, manufacturing, and quality teams involved with products using this component.

7. Future Trends in Component Lifecycle Documentation

The field of component data management is evolving. While PDF datasheets remain common, there is a strong trend towards:

• Machine-Readable Data: Formats like IPC-2581 or vendor-specific APIs allow lifecycle data to be integrated directly into design and supply chain software, enabling automated alerts for EOL notices or revision changes.
• Blockchain for Traceability: Exploring the use of distributed ledgers to create immutable, shared records of component lifecycle events, including revision releases, transfers of custody, and quality certifications.
• Dynamic Datasheets: Web-based datasheets that update in real-time, ensuring users always access the latest revision and lifecycle status without manually checking for updated PDFs.

The static data in this PDF represents the foundational layer upon which these more dynamic, interconnected systems are being built. The principles of clear revision numbering, precise timestamps, and defined lifecycle phases remain paramount.

8. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

8.1 The document shows many identical entries. Which one is correct?

All entries are identical and represent the same data. The repetition is likely an artifact of the document's layout or the PDF text extraction process. The single, valid dataset is: LifecyclePhase: Revision, Revision: 1, Expired Period: Forever, Release Date: 2014-01-16 16:06:38.0.

8.2 Can I still use a component marked with Revision 1 from 2014?

Yes, provided it has been stored correctly (per any separate moisture sensitivity or storage guidelines) and there is no subsequent revision that introduces incompatible changes. You must verify with the component supplier that Revision 1 has not been officially discontinued or superseded by a change that requires design modification.

8.3 What should I do if I find a component with a different revision number?

Do not assume compatibility. First, obtain the datasheet for the new revision (e.g., Revision 2). Perform a detailed comparison of all technical parameters, packaging, and recommended application circuits. An Engineering Change Notice (ECN) from the manufacturer detailing the changes between revisions is the most authoritative source. Do not substitute revisions without a thorough technical review.

8.4 "Forever" seems unrealistic. How should I interpret this?

Interpret "Forever" as "No End-of-Life date is currently scheduled." It indicates stability but is not an absolute guarantee. Maintain a proactive watch on the manufacturer's communications regarding the product family. Consider "Forever" as a strong positive signal for long-term availability, but not a reason to forgo standard lifecycle monitoring practices.