Component Lifecycle Specification - Revision 2 - Release Date 2014-06-10 - English Technical Document

1. Product Overview

This document provides the formal lifecycle specification for a specific electronic component. The core information defines the component's current revision status and its official release timeline. The primary advantage of this standardized documentation is the clear, unambiguous communication of version control and product status, which is critical for supply chain management, quality assurance, and engineering change order (ECO) processes. This information is targeted at engineers, procurement specialists, quality managers, and manufacturing personnel involved in the integration and lifecycle management of electronic components within larger systems.

2. Technical Parameters Deep Objective Interpretation

The provided data focuses on administrative and lifecycle parameters rather than traditional electrical or physical specifications. A detailed analysis of these parameters is essential for proper component management.

2.1 Lifecycle Phase Parameter

The LifecyclePhase is explicitly stated as Revision. This indicates the component is not in an initial prototype (Pre-Production, Engineering Sample) or an end-of-life (EOL, Obsolete) phase. The "Revision" phase signifies that the component design has undergone at least one formal change from a previous version, and the current documentation (Revision 2) is the authoritative source for this updated version. This parameter is crucial for ensuring that the correct version of a component is used in production to avoid discrepancies in performance, footprint, or functionality.

2.2 Revision Parameter

The revision level is specified as 2. This is a sequential identifier tracking the history of changes made to the component's design, documentation, or manufacturing process. A jump from a hypothetical Revision 1 to Revision 2 typically implies a non-trivial change that could affect form, fit, or function. Engineers must cross-reference this revision number with associated change logs or product change notifications (PCNs) to understand the specific modifications implemented.

2.3 Release Date Parameter

The Release Date is precisely recorded as 2014-06-10 16:13:35.0. This timestamp indicates the exact moment the Revision 2 documentation and/or the component itself was officially released for production or distribution. This date serves multiple purposes: it establishes a baseline for calculating product age, helps in auditing and traceability, and is key for determining when this revision superseded the previous one in the supply chain.

2.4 Expired Period Parameter

The Expired Period is listed as Forever. In the context of lifecycle documentation, this typically means the data sheet or specification for Revision 2 does not have a planned obsolescence date for the information itself. It does not necessarily mean the component will be manufactured forever. Instead, it signifies that this revision of the documentation remains valid as the reference for this specific component version indefinitely, or until a new revision (e.g., Revision 3) is issued. The component's production life cycle would be governed by separate product lifecycle status communications.

3. Grading System Explanation

While the provided snippet does not contain performance grading (e.g., for wavelength, flux, voltage), the Revision number itself acts as a critical grading or classification system for the component's design state. All units marked as Revision 2 are guaranteed to conform to the same set of specifications documented at the time of the 2014-06-10 release. Procurement and manufacturing processes must implement checks to ensure only Revision 2 (or a specified compatible revision) is used in assemblies to maintain consistency and reliability.

4. Performance Curve Analysis

This document does not provide graphical performance data such as IV curves or spectral distributions. The "performance" communicated here is administrative reliability and version consistency. The stability of the specification itself, as indicated by a fixed release date and a "Forever" expiration on the document's validity, is a key factor for long-term project planning and reducing the risk of unexpected specification changes.

5. Mechanical and Packaging Information

Specific mechanical details like dimensions, footprint, and polarity are not included in the provided text. A complete datasheet would reference this lifecycle header and then provide detailed mechanical drawings, package outlines, and marking information applicable to Revision 2. It is imperative that any mechanical diagram is explicitly linked to this revision number to prevent assembly errors.

6. Soldering and Assembly Guidelines

General soldering profiles (reflow, wave) are not specified here. However, the revision number is critically important for assembly. If a change between Revision 1 and Revision 2 involved a different package material, finish, or internal die attach, the recommended soldering profile might change. Therefore, the assembly guidelines must be retrieved from the full datasheet or application notes that are specifically associated with Revision 2 of the component.

7. Packaging and Ordering Information

The core ordering information is implicitly defined by the Revision: 2 designation. The correct and complete part number for ordering must include this revision identifier to ensure the factory supplies the exact version documented here. Packaging specifics (tape and reel dimensions, reel quantities, dry pack requirements) would be detailed elsewhere but are also specific to this revision.

8. Application Suggestions

The primary application suggestion derived from this data is the importance of revision control in Bill of Materials (BOM) management. For any application, especially in long-lifecycle products like industrial equipment, automotive, or aerospace systems, locking the BOM to "Revision 2" (as defined on 2014-06-10) is a best practice. This prevents unintentional and potentially incompatible component changes during future production runs. Designers should always reference the full set of technical specifications tied to this revision.

9. Technical Comparison

The key differentiator highlighted is the component's formalized and fixed revision state. Compared to components with less clear lifecycle tracking or frequent, undocumented changes, a component with a clearly defined "Revision 2" and a historical release date offers superior traceability, auditability, and supply chain stability. This reduces engineering risk and facilitates easier qualification and certification processes for end products.

10. Frequently Asked Questions

10.1 What does "LifecyclePhase: Revision" mean?

It means the component design has been formally changed and released as a new version. This is a stable production phase, distinct from prototype or end-of-life stages.

10.2 Is Revision 2 compatible with Revision 1?

Not necessarily. Compatibility must be verified by consulting the Engineering Change Order (ECO) or change summary that details the differences between revisions. Do not assume drop-in compatibility.

10.3 The Expired Period is "Forever." Does this mean the component will never be obsolete?

No. "Forever" applies to the validity of this specific revision's documentation. The component's production life is a separate matter and would be communicated via a Product Discontinuance (PDN) or Last Time Buy (LTB) notice in the future.

10.4 Why is the release timestamp so precise (down to the second)?

Precise timestamps are used in document control and product data management (PDM) systems to uniquely identify the exact release event, avoiding confusion between documents released on the same date.

11. Practical Use Case

Scenario: A manufacturing engineer is preparing a production run for a medical device first built in 2015. The BOM lists a critical integrated circuit.
Action: The engineer checks the component's datasheet header and confirms it is Revision 2, Release Date: 2014-06-10. They then instruct the procurement team to source components specifically identified as "Rev 2" or with a date code after June 2014. They also verify that the assembly instructions and test procedures on file are linked to Revision 2. This diligence ensures the new production units are functionally identical to the originally qualified and approved 2015 units, maintaining regulatory compliance and product safety.

12. Principle Introduction

The principle demonstrated here is formal configuration management in electronics manufacturing. Every component is treated as a configuration item with a unique identifier (including its revision). Any change to the item's design, materials, or manufacturing process results in a new revision number. This creates a clear, auditable history and ensures that all stakeholders (design, procurement, manufacturing, quality) are aligned on the exact version of a part being used. The data provided is the minimal header information required to identify the configuration item's current state.

13. Development Trends

The trend in electronic component documentation is towards greater integration of this lifecycle data into digital supply chain platforms. Revision information, release dates, and lifecycle status are increasingly encoded in machine-readable formats like XML or linked to digital product passports. This allows for automated BOM validation, where software tools can flag components that do not match the specified revision or are nearing obsolescence. Furthermore, there is a growing emphasis on traceability back to raw materials, making precise revision and batch data even more critical for industries like automotive and aerospace. The basic structure shown in this document—clear phase, revision, and date—remains the foundational data model for these advanced systems.